Franklin Graham Courageously Tells Americans The Truth About Obama & Satan

The honorable Franklin Graham told the truth about the Democrats and their corrupted and unsophisticated way of manipulation with every single American. He compares them with the Devil, of course.

Hillary Clinton was in a rush to use her first speech live on TV after her heavy defeat to talk about how Donald Trump and his ‘fake news’ destroyed her life and her career. She blamed President Trump that he or some people in his team colaborated with overseas hackers who worked against her. That’s so ironic. She still lives in a denial, she still thinks that Donald Trump will be somehow impeached.

However, evangelist Franklin Graham made a powerful post in which he reveals the true face of the liberal elites. You really have to see this:

The mainstream media was posting FAKE NEWS for months but nobody said a word, now Hillary Clinton is rude enough to say that Donald Trump was getting help from fake news websites. That’s so pathetic and stupid.

Hillary Clinton and her team traded illegally classified data on private emails, but the liberals blame Trump for collaboration with Russia without a single piece of evidence. On the other hand, we have tons of evidence against Hillary, but the media ignores this completely. And she talks about FAKE NEWS?! Hillary is such a hypocrite.

Franlkin Graham made a good point anyway. Obama and his deep state are servants of the unclean. The media hit the rock bottom with lies and intrigues.

Share this story and spread his message, every American deserves to know who are the biggest existing liars in the world.

Source> Washington Feed

Hillary Just Slapped With A Wrongful Death Lawsuit — And Clinton Thought It Would Never Happen To Her!

The loss of American lives at the embassy in Benghazi, Libya, was a terrible tragedy that few believe could not have been avoided, if only those responsible for issuing orders to send readily available help had done so when help was requested.

We’ve all heard about the claims from special operations SEAL teams that wanted to go help the ambassador, and the soldiers acting as his bodyguards were ordered to “stand down” by persons unknown in the Obama administration. Believe me, we all have our suspicions about who the unknown person or persons might be.

The parents of two of the soldiers killed do believe they know who is responsible and are filing suit against that person to get some legal relief.

From Fox News Politics:

The parents of two of the four Americans who died in the Benghazi attack in 2012 filed a lawsuit Monday against Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, alleging her “reckless handling” of classified information contributed to their deaths.

The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch USA on behalf of Patricia Smith, the mother of Sean Smith, and Charles Woods, the father of Tyrone Woods, for allegedly wrongfully causing the death of their sons as well as for defamation and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

The lawsuit suggests that Clinton’s use of a private email server contributed to the deaths of Smith and Woods, adding that terrorists were able to “obtain the whereabouts of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and thus the U.S. State Department and covert and other government operations in Benghazi, Libya and subsequently orchestrate, plan, and execute the now infamous September 11, 2012 attack.”

“Having used a secret private email server that we now know was used to communicate with Ambassador Christopher Stevens with confidential and classified government information, and which we also now know was likely hacked by hostile adversaries such as Iran, Russia, China and North Korea aligning with terrorist groups, it is clear that Hillary Clinton allegedly negligently and recklessly gave up the classified location of the plaintiffs’ sons, resulting in a deadly terrorist attack that took their lives,” Klayman said in a statement announcing the suit.

In addition to the wrongful death and negligence charges named in the suit, the parents also claim that Clinton defamed them in statements to the media, according to court documents.

“During her campaign for President, Defendant Clinton has negligently, recklessly, and/or maliciously defamed Plaintiffs by either directly calling them liars, or by strongly implying that they are liars, in order to protect and enhance her public image and intimidate and emotionally harm and silence them to not speak up about the Benghazi attack on at least four separate occasions,” Klayman wrote in his complaint.

Patricia Smith has previously spoken out against Clinton, most recently at the Republican National Convention in July.

Hopefully this will finally be the lawsuit that takes her down!

Source: Fox News Politics | ACH

Herman Cain finally Said what Everyone has been too AFRAID to Say!

Former Presidential Candidate and CEO Herman Cain addressed his fellow African-Americans and advised them to stop wasting time on statues and instead focus on solving today’s real problems.

Here’s what he wrote:

“[…] I AM AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN. I HATE THE INSTITUTION OF SLAVERY AS MUCH AS BISHOP DUKES DOES. BUT I HAVE NOTICED SOMETHING HE SEEMS TO HAVE MISSED. I AM NOT A SLAVE! AND NEITHER IS HE.
SLAVERY WAS AN AWFUL HISTORICAL INJUSTICE, AND IT HELPED SET IN MOTION MANY OF THE PROBLEMS THE BLACK COMMUNITY FACES TODAY. BUT IT IS NOT THE PROBLEM WE NEED TO SOLVE TODAY. THOSE PROBLEMS ARE POVERTY, ILLITERACY, DRUGS, CRIME AND VIOLENCE.
TEARING DOWN STATUES DOESN’T SOLVE ANY OF THOSE PROBLEMS, AND SOLVING THOSE PROBLEMS IS WHAT WE NEED TO BE FOCUSED ON.
IT MIGHT CREATE A PROBLEM, THOUGH. TEARING DOWN STATUES THAT REPRESENT HISTORY IS LIKE PRETENDING HISTORY DIDN’T HAPPEN. IT DID. AND NOT EVERYTHING THAT RESULTS FROM HISTORY IS SOMETHING YOU WILL LIKE. WE NEED TO REMEMBER ALL OF IT, EVEN (AND PERHAPS ESPECIALLY) THE PARTS THAT BOTHER US BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT WE LEARN FROM.
[…] TELL YOU WHAT: WHY DON’T YOU ERASE FROM HISTORY EVERY REFERENCE TO A PERSON WHO HAD A SERIOUS CHARACTER FLAW?
[…] OR WE COULD JUST TELL THE WHOLE STORY. YES, THESE MEN HAD AN AMAZING VISION AND USED IT TO CREATE THE GREATEST NATION THE WORLD HAS EVER SEEN. YES, THEY GAVE US A POLITICAL SYSTEM THAT HAS PROTECTED FREEDOM AND PROSPERITY LIKE NOTHING WE’VE EVER SEEN.
ALSO, THEY WERE PARTICIPANTS IN AN INSTITUTION THAT WAS EVIL, IF VERY COMMON FOR WEALTHY MEN OF THEIR DAY. THEY MIGHT HAVE BEEN BETTER MEN IF THEY HAD RID THE WORLD OF THAT INSTITUTION, AND THEY DID NOT DO THAT. BUT THEY DID CREATE THE POLITICAL SYSTEM THROUGH WHICH IT WOULD BE ELIMINATED LESS THAN A CENTURY LATER. THAT IS NOT NOTHING.
[…] FLAWED MEN AND WOMEN HAVE GIVEN US QUITE A WORLD, AND WE SHOULD KNOW AS MUCH ABOUT IT AS WE CAN. MAYBE THE LESSONS THEY TEACH CAN EVEN HELP US SOLVE THE PROBLEMS WE FACE TODAY.
OR WE CAN WASTE OUR TIME TEARING DOWN STATUES, WHICH SOLVES NOTHING, NOR DOES IT MAKE HISTORY GO AWAY. IT JUST MAKES US IGNORANT OF IT.”

Source>Pride of America

POLL: Should Obama Be Charged For Spying On President Trump?

More evidence has been revealed to show that the mastermind behind all of the unmasking, leaking of information, and spying on then-candidate Trump and his campaign were all orchestrated by former President Barack Obama.

His minions of deep state deceit – Rice, Comey, Mueller – have done everything they’ve can to deflect all rumors that would reveal the truth: Barack Obama is wanting to take down President Trump as quickly as possible.

With new information surrounding Obama’s abilities to spy on President Trump and those surrounding the president, do you think it is time for Barack to face the music?

New Leftist Move Just Erupts! Now They Are Trying To Take Away Major Constitutional Right From Senior Citizens, You’ll Be Furious

 

The left might you want to disclose to you that they’re not a group of extremists. They are, and they are deceiving you. We should confront certainties: liberals have an agenda. To ensure that agenda, libs do their best to stifle conservative votes. It’s disgusting, however common, and furthermore essential governmental issues. The present strategy is new, in any case. The old techniques for vote suppression typically included Fake News. You need the country’s liberals to overlook the advantages of the Conservative Agenda? Simply call the conservatives ‘racists.’ Works unfailingly, and it just kills any shot that generally sensible libs may at last vote their inner voice.

Obviously, there are times when the Left gets significantly nastier than simply Fake News. Once in a while, they go in for absolute voter suppression. In related news, liberals are currently attempting to smother the votes of the elderly. All things considered, they’re quite recently old individuals… for what reason would it be a good idea for them to in any case have the privilege to vote? This, women and men of their word, is the manner by which outrageous the left has gotten.

Via Conservative Tribune:

Liberals are grumbling about how the elderly no longer deserve the right to vote, since they don’t vote progressive enough.

The topic was raised in July by Maclean’s, with author Daniel Munro considering arguments as to why the elderly should have their voting rights revoked at some point, such as around 70-years-old.

“The idea is that once citizens reach a certain age, they will be less concerned with our social, political, and economic future than younger generations and much less likely to bear the long-term consequences of political decisions and policies.”

“In that case, their votes ought to be discounted, or eliminated altogether.”

Sickening.

Be that as it may, possibly Munro is only a screwball? Possibly he’s not mainstream dynamic idea. That is to say, dislike two individuals are making this contention.

George Chesterton noted that elderly people often have their drivers’ license revoked when they are deemed unfit to continue driving, and also noted that prisoners are not allowed to vote, thus proving that revoking voting rights from certain segments of the population isn’t infringing upon democracy.

On the off chance that somebody says something insane once, expect it’s a joke

A few times? Consider them important. Furthermore, respect your senior citizens.

H/T My Right America, Conservative Tribune

“Mueller’s Allegedly Lawless Acts Have Corrupted His Probe and Demand His Removal”

Read Jarrett’s full report below:

“Special Counsel Robert Mueller is accused of acting in complete disregard for the law and must be removed.  And so, too, must his entire team.

There is devastating new evidence to suggest that Mueller and his staff of lawyers improperly, if not illegally, obtained tens of thousands of private documents belonging to President-elect Trump’s Presidential Transition Team (PTT).  The material includes emails, laptops and cell phones used by 13 PTT members.

Critically, a “significant volume of privileged material” was taken by Mueller, according to the Trump transition lawyer, and then used by the special counsel team in its investigation. Mueller’s staff apparently admits this egregious violation, which the law strictly forbids.

Under the law, the only remedy is Mueller’s dismissal from the case.

The Records Are Private

The Presidential Transition Act states that all records of transition operations are private and confidential.

Gregg Jarrett, a long time Fox News legal analyst, blasted Special Counsel Robert Mueller this morning stating, “Mueller’s allegedly lawless acts have corrupted his probe and demand his removal.”

Shocking news broke Saturday that a lawyer for President Trump’s presidential transition team is accusing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office of illegally obtaining documents as part of its Russia probe, including confidential attorney-client communications, privileged communications and thousands of emails without the Trump team’s knowledge or required approval.

This is a disgusting abuse on Robert Mueller’s part. Any communication between President Donald J. Trump and the transition team is protected by law and Mueller is fully aware of this.

Americans have already lost faith in Mueller’s investigation and last week the New York Times demanded that Mueller step down.

Fox New’s Gregg Jarrett wrote a special report on Sunday breaking down just how serious these allegations against Robert Mueller and his team are.

On November 16, 2016, roughly ten days after Trump was elected president, the Chief Records Officer of the U.S. Government sent a letter to all federal agencies reminding them that “the materials that PTT members create or receive are not Federal or Presidential records, but are considered private materials.”

Yet Mueller seems to have ignored the law.  Without a warrant or subpoena, his team of lawyers brazenly demanded these private records from the General Services Administration (GSA) which held custody of the materials.  The GSA does this as a service to all incoming presidents out of courtesy, but it neither owns the documents nor is authorized to release them to anyone under any circumstances because they are deemed entirely private.

IF TRUE, MUELLER’S CONDUCT IS NOT ONLY UNETHICAL AND IMPROPER, IT CONSTITUTES LAWLESSNESS. ON THIS BASIS, HE MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED.

Counsel for the Trump Transition Team has sent a letter to Congress alleging the Fourth Amendment was violated in “failing to obtain a warrant for the search or seizure of private property in which the owner has a reasonable expectation of privacy (Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 489).”

 

Mueller might contest the claim of an unlawful seizure because the GSA willingly handed over the documents, but this disregards the fact that the GSA broke the law and Mueller surely knew it when he pressured the agency to do so.

Privileged MaterialThe most serious charge against Mueller is that he obtained, reviewed and used material that is privileged.

For months, Mueller allegedly failed to disclose to the transition team that he acquired these privileged documents. Under the law, he and his lawyers are not entitled to possess or read any of them. Even worse, the transition team says it warned the special counsel six months ago that it had no right to access the records without gaining permission from the PTT.

Courts have clearly stated what prosecutors are supposed to do under these circumstances: “An attorney who receives privileged documents has an ethical duty to cease review of the documents, notify the privilege holder, and return the documents.” (U.S. v. Taylor 764 Fed Sup 2nd, 230, 235)

Did Mueller do this? Apparently not. He never notified PTT when his staff of lawyers encountered the privileged documents and he compounded his violation of the law by possessing and accessing them for months.

Only the owner of such materials can waive the privileged that protects them. Since the GSA does not, under the law, own the records, only the transition team can make such a waiver. It did not.

Hence, if any illegally obtained documents have been used in the Trump-Russia case, then the results are tainted and invalid. This is a well-established principle of law.

Mueller Must Be Removed

The use by Mueller of even one privileged document can, and must, result in his disqualification from the case.

The case of Finn v. Schiller, 72 F.3rd 1182, 1189 spells out the required remedy for this violation of the law: “Courts have frequently used their supervisory authority to disqualify prosecutors for obtaining materials protected by the attorney-client privilege.”

Statutory law also demands Mueller’s removal. Pursuant to 5 C.F.R. 2635.501, government employees, including prosecutors, are directed to “take appropriate steps to avoid an appearance of loss of impartiality in the performance of his or her official duties.”

The lawyer for the Trump transition team states that the special counsel’s office admitted in a telephone conversation on Friday that it failed to use an “ethical wall” or “taint team” to segregate any privileged records. This is often done to keep them isolated from lawyers and investigators involved in the case.

Yet, Mueller did not adopt such precautionary measures. Instead, he apparently allowed his team to utilize the documents while questioning witnesses in the Trump-Russia case.

If true, Mueller’s conduct is not only unethical and improper, it constitutes lawlessness. On this basis, he must be removed and replaced.

Given the insular nature of the special counsel operation, it is reasonable to conclude that all the lawyers and investigators likely accessed the privileged documents. Therefore, not just Mueller, but his entire team must be dismissed. This would include Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein who oversees the case.

Either Congress should take aggressive action or the Presidential Transition Team (now Trump for America, Inc.) must petition a federal judge to order their removal.

The integrity of the special counsel probe has been deeply compromised by numerous allegations of corrupt acts. In its current composition, it seems beyond repair.”

Folks, Do you agree that it is time for Robert Mueller to step down?

Source> American grits

President Trump Just Threw Obama’s Legacy in the Trash Where It Belongs — Muslims Are FURIOUS!

President Donald J. Trump crushed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in an unexpected landslide in 2016 to take the presidency. His platform was simple: reign in uncontrolled immigration, put American interests first, and undo everything that Obama spent eight years putting in place.

Well, in keeping with his campaign promises, Trump’s new national security strategy is set to be released on Monday and from all reports, it’s in direct contradiction to Obama’s policies.

Check it out, per Daily Caller:

Trump’s new national security strategy places an emphasis on stopping Islamist terrorism and calls it out by name. Obama’s 2015 national security strategy referred to Islam just twice: once because it’s part of ISIS’ name and once to say the administration rejected “the lie that America and its allies are at war with Islam.”

The new national security strategy explicitly links Islamist ideology to jihadist terrorism.

“The United States continues to wage a long war against jihadist terrorist groups such as ISIS and Al Qaeda. These groups are linked by a common radical Islamist ideology that encourages violence against the United States and our partners and produces misery for those under their control,” the new strategy states.

Trump’s strategy also notes, “jihadist terrorists such as ISIS and al-Qaida continue to spread a barbaric ideology that calls for the violent destruction of governments and innocents they consider to be apostates. These Islamist terrorists attempt to force those under their influence to submit to Sharia law.” A source familiar with the strategy’s drafting process described the reference to Sharia law as a “huge” inclusion by the Trump administration.

Thank God that somebody in Washington understands the real threat that Islam poses to the United States of America! Were the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001 not enough? How many more times does this country need to be seriously harmed before we wake up?

Barack Hussein Obama refused to even call the terrorists what they actually were… He used vague terms like “extremists” or “the terrorists,” all the while denying the reality of the situation.

Those men were Muslims who hated this country and would stop at nothing, including giving their own lives, to bring this country to its knees.

We finally have a president who understands this!

POLL: Do You Believe Jesus Was Born of the Virgin Mary?

A recent Pew Poll shows that despite an increasing decline in “religious” Americans, 66% of adults remained faithful in believing that Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary.

This is encouraging as Christmas quickly approaches and America continues to battle with the worldly aftermath of the Obama Presidency disaster.

Are you faithful in believing that Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary?

BREAKING: Feds Conduct Massive Gang Raid in Texas — Agents Shocked at What They Found…

A massive operation in the city of San Antonio, Texas, resulted in the arrest of 215 gang members and the seizure of a vast quantity of drugs, guns, and illicit cash. The sweep was the end result of a nearly three-month-long collaboration between federal, state, and local agencies, but despite the large haul, officials say there is always more work to be done.

Known as Operation Triple Beam, the action involved Deputy U.S. Marshals, Bexar County Sheriff’s Office deputies, Texas State troopers and local San Antonio police officers, and aside from the hundreds of criminals caught up in the net, officers also seized 70 guns, $233,373 in cash, and $176,153 worth of drugs. Additionally, the San Antonio Express-News tells us that at least 40 of those picked up were federal fugitives.

Reports have not yet been clear on which gangs, exactly, were targetted by the most recent bust, but many believe that those brought into custody may have had some ties with the notorious MS-13 organization. MS-13 has become a direct target of the Trump administration, and the President himself has promised further crackdowns to rid our nation of the murderous transnational criminal enterprise. If this raid did indeed MS-13, it would pose a massive blow to their operations in the state of Texas.

Texas governor Greg Abbot has also said that he plans to step up anti-gang operations after declaring the city of Houston “hostile territory for gangs” this past April. “This recent wave of senseless violence cannot continue,” the governor said at a press conference earlier this year. “Government’s foremost responsibility is to keep our citizens safe and secure. Texas will take action and use all lawful means to put an end to this lawlessness.”

Despite the recent successes, crime is not about to stop simply because of this wave of arrests, and officials warn that there is still plenty more police work to be done in order to clean our country’s streets. “We have to keep the pressure up and keep working,” San Antonio Assistant Police Chief James Flavin said. “We just have to keep being proactive.”

Source: http://sunrepublican.com