Former President Bill Clinton showed once again just how bitter he really is last night when he took a shot at President Donald Trump while speaking at a One Night Only special honoring Alec Baldwin in New York City.

Daily Mail reported that the event was full of anti-Trump celebrities, including Robert De Niro, Julianne Moore, Tracy Morgan and Jane Krakowski. While talking about Baldwin onstage, Clinton took a classless shot at Trump.“He ended up going to George Washington University for two years, ran for student body president,” Clinton said of Baldwin. “Then came back home to New York where he followed the then-classic path – from politics into soap operas… Now we know it works the other way round.”

That last part was a clear dig at Trump, who became president after he already had a successful career in television. Unfortunately for Clinton, all he accomplished with this was making himself look pathetic. When the American people voted for Trump over his wife, they were letting Clinton know that they could care less about what he thinks about anything.

 SHARE this story if you think Bill Clinton has NO CLASS!

Judge Napolitano Predicts How Many Years Loretta Lynch Will Spend In Jail

Judge Andrew Napolitano just dropped a bombshell on Fox Business Network today. He said that former Attorney General Loretta Lynch is facing a long prison sentence of between 5-10 years for her roles in the crimes of the past administration.

Judge Nap said, and this sent a shiver down the spine of both Obama and Lynch,“I would actually extend it one step farther. There is enough evidence here, just on the basis of the little snippets given to the Senate Intelligence Committee by former FBI Director Jim Comey, that Mrs. Lynch was either conflicted or working at odds with the Justice Department and in behalf of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign and the DNC when she told them to use different terminology for the investigation.”

Judge Nap went on to explain the legal framing for the charges as well as that President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions have the right to conduct a special investigation into this matter.

They are well within their rights and there is nothing the Democrats can do about it.

“It is alleged, this document has not seen the light of day if it exists, that there are one or several emails between Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Loretta Lynch concerning the behavior that Loretta Lynch will take to further the DNC interests while Mrs. Lynch was attorney general,” Napolitano said before saying the words that made Loretta Lynch think about fleeing the country,

“If such emails exist, it would amount to “misconduct in office. It’s a felony,” he said. “Depending upon exactly what they charged her with, it could be five or 10 years in jail. It’s very serious. It’s the equivalent of obstruction of justice. It’s the same allegation they are making about the president.”

Correct but with Lynch we already have concrete proof via under oath testimony from one of her co-conspirators.

Share this if you want Loretta Lynch to get the full 10 years behind bars.


BREAKING: Obama’s Girlfriend Exposes REAL Reason She Had To CUT Him Out Of Her Life

Now that Barack Obama is out of office, more information is coming out about who he really is. A telling new biography gives accounts from his closest relationships that shine a light on his dark convictions.

In David J. Garrow’s Obama biography Rising Star, he interviews ex-Obama girlfriend Sheila Miyoshi-Jager, who reveals that she broke up with the former President for his refusal to condemn black anti-Semitism (via Politico).

This is a bombshell revelation, though it comes as no surprise to those of us who have long seen Obama for the con man he is. Obama is a lifelong Muslim sympathizer who despises Israel for challenging Islam in the Middle East.

Jager told Garrow that her relationship with Obama deteriorated quickly when he remained firm in his support of then black Chicago mayoral aide Steve Cokely–a vocal antisemite.

These weren’t “dog whistles” like the accusations the Lefty typically makes in race-baiting smears against Republicans. Cokely was upfront in his disgusting assaults on Jews. Even the media of the day was critical of him!

Cokely preached the belief that Jews run a world conspiracy to take over the world. He also made the outlandish and incredibly racist claim that Jewish doctors are responsible for AIDS by injecting black patients with the disease.

Anyone in their right mind would be immediately put off by such a raging psychotic. Smart people would do their best to distance themselves from any association with this deranged hater of Jews. But not Barry Obama.

Obama wouldn’t budge in his affinity for the bigot Cokely. Eventually, Sheila Jager had to pull the plug on her relationship with the young community organizer. She had good reasons for doing so.

Jager’s father, Brend Jager, grew up in the Netherlands during World War II. As a boy, he witnessed the appalling treatment of Jews at the hands of German soldiers; those images forever etched in his memory. As an adult, Jager became a conservative Republican. As soon as he met his daughter’s boyfriend, he knew the ambitious Leftist was no good.

This wouldn’t be the last time Obama sided with anti-Semites. One of his closest mentors, the infamous Chicago preacher Jeremiah Wright, was known for his offensive remarks against Jews. Obama, who always preached against racism, seems to have no qualms about fomenting racism when it’s against Jewish people. What a hypocrite!

It’s sad. More Jews are Democrats than Republicans. But the Democrat Party has no interest in protecting Jews. They would gladly let Muslim terrorists destroy the State of Israel if patriots like Trump didn’t stand in their way.

At the end of the day, Democrats don’t care about minorities. They use them as pawns. Obama’s close relationships with these anti-Semites are telling of his real feelings for Jews. Thank goodness his presidency is done. Good riddance!


BREAKING: Tennessee Issues PERFECT Response to Trump-Hating California

California’s Leftist politics have transformed the once-great state into a decadent cesspool of poverty, degeneracy, and corruption that’s on a downward spiral to ruin. Nevertheless, California still wants to tell everyone else how to live.

They’ve gone so far as to place a travel ban on states that don’t buy into the LGBT agenda. But Tennessee is striking back with a SCATHING response that squarely puts California in its place (via Twitter). The burn is amazing!

Democrats have such large majorities in California’s state government; they think they’re the masters of the universe. But Tennessee is trolling them at epic proportions, showcasing the incompetence of California politicians for all Americans to see.

The Tennessee legislature issued an official response–and they’re taking California to town! Their response not only explains why California’s travel ban is contrary to our federal system but exposes California as a horribly-run state that has no business telling other states how to govern.

The third paragraph is particularly harsh. “Whereas, California’s attempt to influence public policy in our state is akin to Tennessee expressing its disapproval of California’s exorbitant taxes, spiraling budget deficits, runaway social welfare programs, and rampant illegal immigration …” BOOM. Couldn’t have said it better myself.

California is totally mismanaged. The only reason they continue the appearance of prosperity is that they’re propped up by federal money. Otherwise, California would be in the same shape as Venezuela right now.

That’s why so many residents and businesses are abandoning California for more prosperous states. They’re going to Texas, Arizona, and the South. In fact, Californians are emigrating to several of the states targeted by the travel ban.

But the response gets better. It states that even though California won’t be sending economic development teams to steal Tennessee businesses, Tennessee will still send their teams to recruit business in California. OUCH!

Then it gets into the major question at hand: the relationship between states in a Federal system. The Tennessee resolution states that in the US, every state is to have sovereignty within its borders on issues within its jurisdiction. Since the Constitution gives states all powers not specifically delegated to the Federal government, each state enjoys a significant scope of authority.

States are supposed to respect the legitimate laws passed within one another’s borders. If they start placing travel bans and sanctions on each other, where would we end up? What if the Southern states decided to retaliate against California, soon we’d have open economic warfare between the states; a nation torn apart by factions instead of united.

Tennessee goes on to call on its fellow states to “refrain from imposing a moral judgment on their sister states as California has done to prevent escalating foolishness.” “Fools”–that’s exactly what California’s Democrat politicians are.

Tennessee is the adult in the room. They’re doing their part to ensure America works the way it’s supposed to. Californians will continue to whine and complain like children. They deserve to be taught a lesson–maybe take away all their Federal funding?

What do you think about this comment below.


POLL: Should Trump Ban Muslim Veils In America?

Trump has already pledged to keep Americans safe by banning travel from countries with radical Islamic terror.

Now another major country, Norway, is banning Muslim veils in schools, as they make it hard to educate young women (read more below).

Do you think Trump should put an end to this practice? Should America allow Muslims to wear hijabs and niqabs?

Vote in our national poll below, learn more about what Norway is doing to stop it in their country, and let us know your opinion in the comments!


VIDEO: Newt Gingrich Says Musims Who Believe In Sharia Law Should Be DEPORTED… Do You Agree?

Newt Gingrich has once again felt the pulse of America and has not been shy in expressing what many are feeling. He said on Fox News that:”Let me be as blunt and direct as I can be. Western Civilization is in a war,” and that “Sharia is incompatible with Western Civilization. We need to be fairly relentless about defining who our enemies are.”

But this is not just a problem in America. In almost every Western nation where there is mass-migration of people from majority Muslim nations, there is tension, and violence, and all too often terror attacks. The biggest problem these nations face, is how to remain a free and tolerant society that accepts people of all faiths whilst still safeguarding the population from violent extremists.

In the UK, there are 23,000 people on the Security Service’s Terrorist watch list. The sheer number means that it is impossible to launch investigations into whether or not they are actual threats. So the answer can’t be to try and weed out the wrong doers. Equally, many on the watch list will be so because of someone they may have met…In a free country we don’t punish people for their associates or acquaintances.

The one positive action that can be taken to ensure the threat does not actually get any worse, is to introduce extreme vetting of people who may have links to terrorism. If proper vetting (such as five years worth of social media accounts, correct paper work etc…) is put in place, we can at least be sure that we are not letting in even more people who wish us harm. But will the 9th circuit agree?

The psychological links between Islamic terror and Sharia law are such that any Muslim who adheres to the 7th century code should be deported, says former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

 “Let me be as blunt and direct as I can be. Western Civilization is in a war,” Gingrich said on Fox News following a recent Islamic terror attack that killed 84 people in Nice, France. “Sharia is incompatible with Western Civilization. We need to be fairly relentless about defining who our enemies are.”

While Gingrich makes the forceful argument that U.S. immigration policy should be vehemently against Sharia for the sake of protecting society, he seems to have no problem with “moderate” Muslims who are entering the country and settling.

So how do we test “moderate” Muslims with any degree of truth or reliability? Would an oath of allegiance or a religious litmus test resolve the dilemma?

Our military exploits across the Middle East have taught how easy it is for jihadists to hide away in so-called moderate communities that offer them protection.

It’s the so-called moderate Muslims that are calling for their own “safe zones” in Australia and the U.S., and it’s the so-called moderate Muslims that rise up with threats of violence over a billboard in Indianapolis that criticizes the prophet Mohammed.

It basically comes down to numbers and demographics. As long as Muslim communities remain small they will remain peaceful for the most part and adhere to the rules of the larger society. As their numbers grow, however, they begin to organize politically, voting in blocs while demanding that society bend to their rules and demands.

We only have to look at the city of London, England, with its non-white majority and its Muslim mayor, and its generally hostile attitude toward native Britons in order to begin to understand the dangers posed by multiculturalism.

The only people that seem to demand that Western countries be continually flooded with Third World migrants are the same people who seek to overturn and replace Western civilization entirely.

H/T: US Herald

BREAKING: 3 Journalists Out At CNN After Trump/Russia Fake News Falls Apart

Three fake news journalists are reportedly resigning from CNN following the network’s embarrassingly dubious claim that a senior ally of President Donald Trump was under investigation for ties to a Russian investment bank.

According to an article by CNN’s Brian Stelter, those leaving are “Thomas Frank, who wrote the story in question; Eric Lichtblau, an editor in the unit; and Lex Haris, who oversaw the unit.”

“In the aftermath of the retraction of a story published on, CNN has accepted the resignations of the employees involved in the story’s publication,” Stelter quotes a CNN spokesman as stating.

Stelter adds that “an internal investigation by CNN management found that some standard editorial processes were not followed when the article was published.”

“Te story,” he continues, “which reported that Congress was investigating a ‘Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials,’ cited a single anonymous source.”

“These types of stories are typically reviewed by several departments within CNN — including fact-checkers, journalism standards experts and lawyers — before publication.”

Stelter adds that, during a Monday afternoon meeting, journalists in the investigative unit were told “the retraction did not mean the facts of the story were necessarily wrong. Rather it meant that ‘the story wasn’t solid enough to publish as-is,’ one of the people briefed on the investigation said.”

As reported previously, a leaked internal CNN memo suggests that the media giant is facing further restrictions on its reporters concerning all Russia-related content.


In wake of story retraction, CNNMoney exec editor sends memo to staff mandating all “Russia-related content” must be cleared by him or VP

This controversy comes following another embarrassing anonymous source-related gaffe in CNN’s coverage of the Trump/Russia non-story.

Earlier this month, CNN was forced to correct a story quoting an anonymous source as stating that former FBI Director James Comey would use his House Intelligence Committee testimony to deny claims he told President Trump he was not under investigation.

Comey, of course, did the exact opposite.

Today’s resignations also come following two high-profile firings of CNN staff directly linked to their hatred of President Donald Trump.

On June 9, CNN presenter Reza Aslan was fired from the network over a tweet in which he called President Donald Trump a “piece of sh*t” and an embarrassment to America.

Prior to that, Kathy Griffin was fired for holding up a severed head resembling the President’s.

Conservative Fighters

POLL: Do you agree that the Swiss and Austrians are right to fear the Muslim Invasion?


POLL:  Do you agree that the Swiss and Austrians are right to fear the Muslim Invasion?

Please read and take the poll below.

Switzerland, the traditionally neutral European nation, has taken a clear stance against the Muslim refugee invasion that is plaguing Europe. With the swelling numbers of undocumented immigrants pouring in, they have decided to take action.

Switzerland has issued notice to a portion of its tank units, telling them to put off any vacation time, and that they are to be on standby, anticipating a need to fortify their border protection against the influx of Muslim migrants. Some, of course, will say this crosses the line, but Switzerland is sending a very explicit message to the rest of the world: they are taking the rapefugee issue very seriously.

Governments are responsible, first and foremost, for the protection and safety of their own citizens. Should they fail to do so, they have no business governing. Despite this truth, failing to govern seems to be the sought-after standard for much of Europe’s liberal leaders today. Rushing to show their “compassion” and “understanding,” fools like Germany’s Merkel and Sweden’s entire “we can do no wrong” government have been rushing to flood their communities with as many migrants as possible. THIS DOES NOT SOLVE ANYTHING! It only will make matters worse. The problems must be resolved at the source, in the countries like Syria, Iraq and Yemen, where the issues actually are and SHOULD STAY.

Another fact (queue the liberal hysteria): the migrants who make it all the way to Switzerland have done so by choice. No one forced them to go anywhere. They passed through many other safe nations (and more than likely registered in at least one), and now are continuing their nomadic trek into Switzerland, for one reason or another. It is equally the right of the Swiss to protect their own from potential (or more like imminent) dangers that these incapable-of-assimilating refugees pose.

[Please VOTE by tapping YES or NO below!!]

According to Breitbart,

 In a matter of just hours, Europe’s migrant crisis has escalated following the unexpected announcement Wednesday night by Austria’s Defense Minister Hans Peter Doskozil that his country is prepared to close its border if Italy does not get its migrant problem under control.

After Italy sharply criticized the Austrian plan, Switzerland has declared it is considering posting tanks to secure its own border with Italy. “We expect a significant increase in the number of refugees this summer. If Austria now closes off the Brenner Pass, Switzerland will become the only gateway to Northern Europe. Before that, we have to protect ourselves,” said Norman Gobbi, the security director of the Swiss Canton of Ticino.

The region has some 2,000 soldiers of the Swiss Tank Battalion at the ready, and they have been asked to postpone vacations in order to be available as needs may arise. As other migrant routes become more restricted or close altogether, Italy is becoming increasingly the path of choice for migrants coming both from the south and from the east. Heading north through Italy, if Austria no longer becomes an option, “many will then travel to Switzerland,” Gobbi said.

Austria is wasting no time in building a wall. Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

“We have to go on the offensive,” said Austria’s Defense Minister Wednesday night, referring to more strict border control.


Now, HOW LIBERALS will deal with this reality without TYING THEMSELVES INTO KNOTS is beyond me, BUT THE FACTS ARE RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEM.


Source: Breitbart | LLN

New BOMBSHELL discovered in Hillary emails CONFIRMS criminal activity

Hillary Clinton really ought to have stayed in the woods – because it may be the only place she finds herself out of scandal.

In addition to the investigation into her private email server during the 2016 presidential election (from which she somehow emerged unscathed), there was also an FBI probe into the activities of the Clinton Foundation. While officially the Clinton family’s charitable arm, it’s been long accused of acting as nothing more than a slush fund for the Clintons. Given how little of the Foundation’s funds actually go to charity, that wouldn’t be all that surprising.

In 2013 the Foundation spent only 10 percent of its budget on charitable grants. For comparison, an equal 10 percent of the budget went towards travel, 33 percent on salaries/benefits, and 47 percent on all other expenses (rent, supplies, IT).

We haven’t heard much about the status of that probe, and there are no news articles giving us an update on the status of the probe since November of last year. Perhaps Comey killed it to further shield Hillary.

Regardless, we just got confirmation of wrongdoing in the Clinton Foundation.


Read full article at:

[Note: This post was written by Matt Palumbo. He is a co-author of the new book A Paradoxical Alliance: Islam and the Left, and can be found on Twitter @MattPalumbo12]