New Leftist Move Just Erupts! Now They Are Trying To Take Away Major Constitutional Right From Senior Citizens, You’ll Be Furious

 

The left might you want to disclose to you that they’re not a group of extremists. They are, and they are deceiving you. We should confront certainties: liberals have an agenda. To ensure that agenda, libs do their best to stifle conservative votes. It’s disgusting, however common, and furthermore essential governmental issues. The present strategy is new, in any case. The old techniques for vote suppression typically included Fake News. You need the country’s liberals to overlook the advantages of the Conservative Agenda? Simply call the conservatives ‘racists.’ Works unfailingly, and it just kills any shot that generally sensible libs may at last vote their inner voice.

Obviously, there are times when the Left gets significantly nastier than simply Fake News. Once in a while, they go in for absolute voter suppression. In related news, liberals are currently attempting to smother the votes of the elderly. All things considered, they’re quite recently old individuals… for what reason would it be a good idea for them to in any case have the privilege to vote? This, women and men of their word, is the manner by which outrageous the left has gotten.

Via Conservative Tribune:

Liberals are grumbling about how the elderly no longer deserve the right to vote, since they don’t vote progressive enough.

The topic was raised in July by Maclean’s, with author Daniel Munro considering arguments as to why the elderly should have their voting rights revoked at some point, such as around 70-years-old.

“The idea is that once citizens reach a certain age, they will be less concerned with our social, political, and economic future than younger generations and much less likely to bear the long-term consequences of political decisions and policies.”

“In that case, their votes ought to be discounted, or eliminated altogether.”

Sickening.

Be that as it may, possibly Munro is only a screwball? Possibly he’s not mainstream dynamic idea. That is to say, dislike two individuals are making this contention.

George Chesterton noted that elderly people often have their drivers’ license revoked when they are deemed unfit to continue driving, and also noted that prisoners are not allowed to vote, thus proving that revoking voting rights from certain segments of the population isn’t infringing upon democracy.

On the off chance that somebody says something insane once, expect it’s a joke

A few times? Consider them important. Furthermore, respect your senior citizens.

H/T My Right America, Conservative Tribune

“Mueller’s Allegedly Lawless Acts Have Corrupted His Probe and Demand His Removal”

Read Jarrett’s full report below:

“Special Counsel Robert Mueller is accused of acting in complete disregard for the law and must be removed.  And so, too, must his entire team.

There is devastating new evidence to suggest that Mueller and his staff of lawyers improperly, if not illegally, obtained tens of thousands of private documents belonging to President-elect Trump’s Presidential Transition Team (PTT).  The material includes emails, laptops and cell phones used by 13 PTT members.

Critically, a “significant volume of privileged material” was taken by Mueller, according to the Trump transition lawyer, and then used by the special counsel team in its investigation. Mueller’s staff apparently admits this egregious violation, which the law strictly forbids.

Under the law, the only remedy is Mueller’s dismissal from the case.

The Records Are Private

The Presidential Transition Act states that all records of transition operations are private and confidential.

Gregg Jarrett, a long time Fox News legal analyst, blasted Special Counsel Robert Mueller this morning stating, “Mueller’s allegedly lawless acts have corrupted his probe and demand his removal.”

Shocking news broke Saturday that a lawyer for President Trump’s presidential transition team is accusing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office of illegally obtaining documents as part of its Russia probe, including confidential attorney-client communications, privileged communications and thousands of emails without the Trump team’s knowledge or required approval.

This is a disgusting abuse on Robert Mueller’s part. Any communication between President Donald J. Trump and the transition team is protected by law and Mueller is fully aware of this.

Americans have already lost faith in Mueller’s investigation and last week the New York Times demanded that Mueller step down.

Fox New’s Gregg Jarrett wrote a special report on Sunday breaking down just how serious these allegations against Robert Mueller and his team are.

On November 16, 2016, roughly ten days after Trump was elected president, the Chief Records Officer of the U.S. Government sent a letter to all federal agencies reminding them that “the materials that PTT members create or receive are not Federal or Presidential records, but are considered private materials.”

Yet Mueller seems to have ignored the law.  Without a warrant or subpoena, his team of lawyers brazenly demanded these private records from the General Services Administration (GSA) which held custody of the materials.  The GSA does this as a service to all incoming presidents out of courtesy, but it neither owns the documents nor is authorized to release them to anyone under any circumstances because they are deemed entirely private.

IF TRUE, MUELLER’S CONDUCT IS NOT ONLY UNETHICAL AND IMPROPER, IT CONSTITUTES LAWLESSNESS. ON THIS BASIS, HE MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED.

Counsel for the Trump Transition Team has sent a letter to Congress alleging the Fourth Amendment was violated in “failing to obtain a warrant for the search or seizure of private property in which the owner has a reasonable expectation of privacy (Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 489).”

 

Mueller might contest the claim of an unlawful seizure because the GSA willingly handed over the documents, but this disregards the fact that the GSA broke the law and Mueller surely knew it when he pressured the agency to do so.

Privileged MaterialThe most serious charge against Mueller is that he obtained, reviewed and used material that is privileged.

For months, Mueller allegedly failed to disclose to the transition team that he acquired these privileged documents. Under the law, he and his lawyers are not entitled to possess or read any of them. Even worse, the transition team says it warned the special counsel six months ago that it had no right to access the records without gaining permission from the PTT.

Courts have clearly stated what prosecutors are supposed to do under these circumstances: “An attorney who receives privileged documents has an ethical duty to cease review of the documents, notify the privilege holder, and return the documents.” (U.S. v. Taylor 764 Fed Sup 2nd, 230, 235)

Did Mueller do this? Apparently not. He never notified PTT when his staff of lawyers encountered the privileged documents and he compounded his violation of the law by possessing and accessing them for months.

Only the owner of such materials can waive the privileged that protects them. Since the GSA does not, under the law, own the records, only the transition team can make such a waiver. It did not.

Hence, if any illegally obtained documents have been used in the Trump-Russia case, then the results are tainted and invalid. This is a well-established principle of law.

Mueller Must Be Removed

The use by Mueller of even one privileged document can, and must, result in his disqualification from the case.

The case of Finn v. Schiller, 72 F.3rd 1182, 1189 spells out the required remedy for this violation of the law: “Courts have frequently used their supervisory authority to disqualify prosecutors for obtaining materials protected by the attorney-client privilege.”

Statutory law also demands Mueller’s removal. Pursuant to 5 C.F.R. 2635.501, government employees, including prosecutors, are directed to “take appropriate steps to avoid an appearance of loss of impartiality in the performance of his or her official duties.”

The lawyer for the Trump transition team states that the special counsel’s office admitted in a telephone conversation on Friday that it failed to use an “ethical wall” or “taint team” to segregate any privileged records. This is often done to keep them isolated from lawyers and investigators involved in the case.

Yet, Mueller did not adopt such precautionary measures. Instead, he apparently allowed his team to utilize the documents while questioning witnesses in the Trump-Russia case.

If true, Mueller’s conduct is not only unethical and improper, it constitutes lawlessness. On this basis, he must be removed and replaced.

Given the insular nature of the special counsel operation, it is reasonable to conclude that all the lawyers and investigators likely accessed the privileged documents. Therefore, not just Mueller, but his entire team must be dismissed. This would include Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein who oversees the case.

Either Congress should take aggressive action or the Presidential Transition Team (now Trump for America, Inc.) must petition a federal judge to order their removal.

The integrity of the special counsel probe has been deeply compromised by numerous allegations of corrupt acts. In its current composition, it seems beyond repair.”

Folks, Do you agree that it is time for Robert Mueller to step down?

Source> American grits

President Trump Just Threw Obama’s Legacy in the Trash Where It Belongs — Muslims Are FURIOUS!

President Donald J. Trump crushed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in an unexpected landslide in 2016 to take the presidency. His platform was simple: reign in uncontrolled immigration, put American interests first, and undo everything that Obama spent eight years putting in place.

Well, in keeping with his campaign promises, Trump’s new national security strategy is set to be released on Monday and from all reports, it’s in direct contradiction to Obama’s policies.

Check it out, per Daily Caller:

Trump’s new national security strategy places an emphasis on stopping Islamist terrorism and calls it out by name. Obama’s 2015 national security strategy referred to Islam just twice: once because it’s part of ISIS’ name and once to say the administration rejected “the lie that America and its allies are at war with Islam.”

The new national security strategy explicitly links Islamist ideology to jihadist terrorism.

“The United States continues to wage a long war against jihadist terrorist groups such as ISIS and Al Qaeda. These groups are linked by a common radical Islamist ideology that encourages violence against the United States and our partners and produces misery for those under their control,” the new strategy states.

Trump’s strategy also notes, “jihadist terrorists such as ISIS and al-Qaida continue to spread a barbaric ideology that calls for the violent destruction of governments and innocents they consider to be apostates. These Islamist terrorists attempt to force those under their influence to submit to Sharia law.” A source familiar with the strategy’s drafting process described the reference to Sharia law as a “huge” inclusion by the Trump administration.

Thank God that somebody in Washington understands the real threat that Islam poses to the United States of America! Were the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001 not enough? How many more times does this country need to be seriously harmed before we wake up?

Barack Hussein Obama refused to even call the terrorists what they actually were… He used vague terms like “extremists” or “the terrorists,” all the while denying the reality of the situation.

Those men were Muslims who hated this country and would stop at nothing, including giving their own lives, to bring this country to its knees.

We finally have a president who understands this!

BREAKING: Feds Conduct Massive Gang Raid in Texas — Agents Shocked at What They Found…

A massive operation in the city of San Antonio, Texas, resulted in the arrest of 215 gang members and the seizure of a vast quantity of drugs, guns, and illicit cash. The sweep was the end result of a nearly three-month-long collaboration between federal, state, and local agencies, but despite the large haul, officials say there is always more work to be done.

Known as Operation Triple Beam, the action involved Deputy U.S. Marshals, Bexar County Sheriff’s Office deputies, Texas State troopers and local San Antonio police officers, and aside from the hundreds of criminals caught up in the net, officers also seized 70 guns, $233,373 in cash, and $176,153 worth of drugs. Additionally, the San Antonio Express-News tells us that at least 40 of those picked up were federal fugitives.

Reports have not yet been clear on which gangs, exactly, were targetted by the most recent bust, but many believe that those brought into custody may have had some ties with the notorious MS-13 organization. MS-13 has become a direct target of the Trump administration, and the President himself has promised further crackdowns to rid our nation of the murderous transnational criminal enterprise. If this raid did indeed MS-13, it would pose a massive blow to their operations in the state of Texas.

Texas governor Greg Abbot has also said that he plans to step up anti-gang operations after declaring the city of Houston “hostile territory for gangs” this past April. “This recent wave of senseless violence cannot continue,” the governor said at a press conference earlier this year. “Government’s foremost responsibility is to keep our citizens safe and secure. Texas will take action and use all lawful means to put an end to this lawlessness.”

Despite the recent successes, crime is not about to stop simply because of this wave of arrests, and officials warn that there is still plenty more police work to be done in order to clean our country’s streets. “We have to keep the pressure up and keep working,” San Antonio Assistant Police Chief James Flavin said. “We just have to keep being proactive.”

Source: http://sunrepublican.com

President Trump Just Made a MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT — And Puts Shady Obama to Shame!

President Trump has had a terrific December of accomplishments. On the heels of his 12-day historic Asia trip, his signature tax relief bill is being reconciled in Congress and will cross his desk before Christmas. His recently unveiled National Security Strategy has been praised by Mark Levin and others as “like Reagan’s third term.”

But, despite all of his successes, Monday was a sad day for our President and for our country…

Before his “America First” national security speech, President Donald Trump addressed the Amtrak train derailment in Washington state. He was quick to reiterate something he has been saying since the beginning of his 2016 bid for the presidency: this country needs a new infrastructure plan!

At least three people were killed and more than 70 were injured when a high-speed passenger train derailed outside Tacoma, Washington. Several train cars tumbled from a highway overpass in the incident.

“Let me begin by expressing our deepest sympathies and most heartfelt prayers to the victims of the train derailment in Washington state,” Trump said. “We are closely monitoring the situation and coordinating with local authorities.”

The train accident that just occurred in DuPont, WA shows more than ever why our soon to be submitted infrastructure plan must be approved quickly. Seven trillion dollars spent in the Middle East while our roads, bridges, tunnels, railways (and more) crumble! Not for long!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 18, 2017

My thoughts and prayers are with everyone involved in the train accident in DuPont, Washington. Thank you to all of our wonderful First Responders who are on the scene. We are currently monitoring here at the White House.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 18, 2017

“It is all the more reason why we need to start immediately fixing the infrastructure of the United States,” he added.

For all of Barack Obama’s spectacular failures, this one is routinely overlooked. He allowed the country’s infrastructure to become dilapidated to the point of criminal negligence!

There are stretches of the national highway system that are practically un-drivable due to pot holes. Compare this country’s network of roadways and interstates with that of Canada or any European country and its’ a disgrace!

Finally, President Trump is doing what Obama never could or would…

Check out the details, per Fox News:

The Trump administration is reportedly preparing a $1 trillion infrastructure effort that is expected to be unveiled in early January.

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee declared a state of emergency after Amtrak train 501 derailed about 7:30 a.m. local time along Interstate 5 as it was leaving the new Tacoma station.

A U.S. official told The Associated Press the death toll is expected to rise and track obstruction is being investigated as a possible cause of the derailment.

The National Transportation Safety Board said a “go-team” is departing from Washington, D.C., to investigate the derailment. The Federal Railroad Administration also tweeted it has investigators en route to the scene.

President Trump on passenger train derailment in Washington state: “We are closely monitoring the situation and coordinating with local authorities. It is all the more reason why we must start immediately fixing the infrastructure of the United States.” https://t.co/Y48RpSoqox pic.twitter.com/VkJ2uIOCFc

— CNN (@CNN) December 18, 2017

For eight ridiculous, non-sensical years, Barack Obama allowed this country’s roadways and transportation infrastructure to decline to the point of disaster. He was too busy remaking American culture in his preferred image, submitting to foreign governments, and selling the public the lemon that is Obamacare.

Lib Trump-Hater Meryl Streep Just Got the Worst News of Her Life — She Did Not Expect This!

Liberal media stars and celebrities are used to having everything go their way, and typically enjoy living their lives in their Hollywood and New York echo chambers. Unfortunately for them, however, more and more Americans are being woken up to the realities around them, and are starting to make their voices heard. Noted leftist Meryl Streep found this out the hard way this week, when she awoke to find posters with her face on them scattered around Los Angeles, slamming the actress for her connections to sexual predators Roman Polanski and Harvey Weinstein.

The posters, which appeared near the Hollywood Highland Center, 20th century Fox Studios, and near Meryl Streep’s home in Pasadena, among other places, showed Streep with a red line over her face and the words “#SheKnew” painted boldly in white, alluding to the fact that the actress was aware of the improprieties being conducted by the film moguls she called friends and opted to stay silent about the issue.

Previously, Streep found herself under fire from other Hollywood celebrities, most notably Rose McGowan, who tweeted “Actresses, like Meryl Streep, who happily worked for The Pig Monster [Harvey Weinstein], are wearing black @GoldenGlobes in a silent protest. YOUR SILENCE is THE problem. You’ll accept a fake award breathlessly & affect no real change. I despise your hypocrisy.” Streep, however, denied the connections, but it did little to stop the latest campaign. Have a look for yourself:

And, believe it or not, this isn’t the first time that street art like this has popped up on the streets of Los Angeles. In fact, thanks to the work of a mysterious street artist like Sabo, leftist hypocrisy has been getting called out in the City of Angels for year, and many think that the same man might be behind this latest campaign as well. Take a look at some of Sabo’s previous pieces to see what we mean.

And Sabo had some great pro-Trump signs out there too, after the President won in his landslide victory last November:

It is great to see the left finally getting their comeuppance, and it is even better to see it happening to the hypocrite Meryl Streep. So, Sabo, we here salute you, and we are looking forward to seeing more of your fine work in the future. And for those who wanna see more of his past art, check out his web page here!

Source: http://sunrepublican.com

Libs Are Erupting Over Special ‘Surprise’ Trump Delivered To Muslim Leader’s DC Office

If the Liberals and their supporters thought they couldn’t hate Trump even more, a situation that occurred changed the course of events.

Apparently, President Donald Trump’s administration staff informed the Palestinian Liberation Office (PLO) that their office in Washington, D.C., is about to be shot down.

Not only that, they were warned that if they somehow act, or in other manners, show hostile behaviour towards Israel, America’s single ally from the Middle East, they’re gonna be completely kicked out of the States.

Our source, Mad World News, states that unlike President Obama, the current President Trump has a short temper regarding the terror the Muslim terroristic organizations are doubtlessly seeding in the Middle East, despite the peace treaty that has been signed.

In a report by The Daily Caller, we are discovering that the State Department announced that the PLO violated U.S. law by provoking the International Criminal Court (ICC) to punish the Israelis because of constructing apartment complexes on Israeli land, which the Palestinians hope to lay claim to. The Palestinian Liberation Office overstepped the law of the States when Palestinian Authority President, Mahmoud Abbas asked the ICC to “open an investigation and to prosecute Israeli officials for their involvement in settlement activities and aggression against our people.”

Clockwork wise, the Palestinian government, despite breaking numerous peace treaties with Israel, dares once again to put the blame on the U.S. for their incapacity and disinclination to live in peace and harmony with their Jewish neighbors. Alternatively, they blamed the American government for obstructing itself as a “mediator” and “sponsor” for peace between the two, RT reports.

“The Palestinian side has not received any ideas, even though many months have passed and in spite of numerous meetings held with the US side, which disqualifies the US administration from playing the role of a mediator and removes itself from the job as a sponsor of the political process,” Rudeineh’s statement said.

What is your personal opinion on this?

Scroll down to the comments and tell us what you think.

H/T: Mad World News |  CF

This Is Huge! Top Republican Calls For Robert Mueller To Be Fired

US Representative Matt Gaetz has had an exceptionally brilliant career no doubt, yet don’t go finding him on Wikipedia at any point in the near future. It gives the idea that the individual who has commandeered that page is completely sickened by both Gaetz and our leader, Donald Trump. The articles expounded on Gaetz are totally surprising, considering this should be where impartial sentiments are posted. Such a great amount of that.

Notwithstanding, the purpose of this is no place can a Republican get a reasonable deal, particularly when he is 100% in favor of what’s correct? In the authoritative issues he has been included, Gaetz is a dependable, strong Right-wing fellow. According to the Fake News Industrial Complex, that is a major negative, yet from the perspective of the American voter, it is noteworthy in addition to.

Representative Gaetz has approached to demand that Special Counsel Robert Mueller be dismissed or step down from his job as an investigator in the Trump-Russia collusion examination following every one of the disclosures regarding his past inclusion in the Uranium One deal where he was the sitting Director of the FBI!

Via Right Wing News:

Representative Matt Gaetz (R-FL) called for Robert Mueller to be fired in a speech delivered to the House of Representatives on Wednesday because of his “indisputable conflicts of interest.”

“We are at risk of a coup d’état in this country if we allow an unaccountable person with no oversight to undermine the duly-elected President of the United States,” Gaetz said. “That is precisely what is happening right now with the indisputable conflicts of interest that are present with Mr. Mueller and others at the Department of Justice.”

“I join … in calling for Mr. Mueller’s resignation or his firing,” Gaetz continued.

Just last week, Mr. Gaetz proposed a resolution that says Mueller is a compromised Special Counsel. This is due to the fact that Mueller was serving as FBI director when the Russian company purchased uranium operations in the U.S in 2010.

“These deeply troubling events took place when Mr. Mueller was the Director of the FBI. As such, his impartiality is hopelessly compromised. He must step down immediately,” Gaetz publicly released in a statement on Friday.

The resolution has two co-sponsors, Reps. Andy Biggs (R-AZ.) and Louie Gohmert (R-TX). Both are members of the Freedom Caucus.

Gaetz didn’t stop there. He also pleaded for the Justice Department to appoint a special counsel to “investigate the Clinton Foundation, the Uranium One deal and the Fusion GPS dossier.” These demands come on the heels of the first indictments to come about from the Mueller investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Gaetz is right, obviously, in any case it doesn’t give the idea that the game-plan of the president will be that he fires the Special Counsel, for various reasons, not the minimum of which is that this examination presently can’t seem to net a solitary shred of confirmation of the agreement by the Trump campaign that Democrats have been demanding was conferred for over a year.

Another reason that Mueller will most likely not be fired is this would just give the Democrats false ammo to flame upon the Oval Office with charges that the Special Counsel was “too close to the truth,” quite recently as they did with the bumbling Comey. On the off chance that Mueller ever gets to the genuine meat of this examination (don’t hold your breath, however) we may even find that the Podestas and the Clintons, and the Obamas, were similarly as chargeable as Manafort and Gates.

Source: http://trueredpatriot.com

FBI Just Released SECRET EMAILS Revealing FALL OUT After Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Meeting

On Friday, the FBI released a series of previously unseen emails which contained in detail the Department of Justice’s response to the fallout of the secret Phoenix tarmac meeting between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton in June 2016.

“THE FBI IS OUT OF CONTROL. IT IS STUNNING THAT THE FBI ‘FOUND’ THESE CLINTON-LYNCH TARMAC RECORDS ONLY AFTER WE CAUGHT THE AGENCY HIDING THEM IN ANOTHER LAWSUIT,” JUDICIAL WATCH TOM FITTON SAID IN A STATEMENT. “JUDICIAL WATCH WILL CONTINUE TO PRESS FOR ANSWERS ABOUT THE FBI’S DOCUMENT GAMES IN COURT. IN THE MEANTIME, THE FBI SHOULD STOP THE STONEWALL AND RELEASE THESE NEW RECORDS IMMEDIATELY.”

The dates on the emails range from July 1-3, 2016 and show the agency scrambling after a local news affiliate “leaked” the infamous tarmac meeting to the national press; with Obama officials urgently trying to get a grasp on the story.

On July 5, 2016, FBI Director James Comey announced former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would not face criminal charges for mishandling classified information.

The emails show one FBI official, whose name and email are redacted, fuming over leaks to the media about the meeting and what happened on the tarmac. The official received an email from a “layman” alleging a local Phoenix police officer who may have talked to a reporter “sounds like a security threat.”

In the emails, officials went back and forth about finding out if the officer was SWAT or simply worked the motorcade and that “at a minimum” he should never work another detail again.

One official asked in an email if local law enforcement assisting the FBI on motorcades should sign non-disclosure agreements in the future.

While another official called an Observer article about the meeting, with details about how President Clinton got to Lynch’s private plane, “infuriating.”

One email, addressed to Andrew McCabe and also then-FBI Director James Comey, shows the internal fall out after early press reports of the meeting.

“I WANT TO FLAG A STORY THAT IS GAINING SOME TRACTION TONIGHT […] ABOUT A LOCAL PHOENIX NEWS REPORT ABOUT A CASUAL, UNSCHEDULED MEETING BETWEEN FORMER PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON AND THE AG,” SAID ONE CORRESPONDENCE. “OUR [TALKING POINTS] ON THIS ARE BELOW.”

The newly released emails only further prove a pattern of corruption and raise new questions over the Clinton-Lynch meeting, as well as why former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was let-off-the-hook by James Comey regarding her illegal use of a private email server.

Republican lawmakers and at least two of President Trump’s lawyers have called for a special counsel to investigate the handling of the Clinton emails probe.

Several congressional committees are also looking into that subject, as is the Justice Department inspector general.

Do you want a special counsel to launch an investigation into the handling of Hillary Clinton’s email probe? 

We want to hear your thoughts about this folks!
Source>  American grits

United Nations Just Issued SICK Ultimatum To Whites In America After Weeks Of Racist NFL Protests

Over the past several weeks, the NFL protests has been all the mainstream media has talked about, as “oppressed” black millionaires keep trying to demonize our country while complaining about the “oppression” they’re forced to “endure” as blacks living in this country. After weeks of NFL protests, now the United Nations is interjecting themselves back into our politics yet again, making a sickening demand of all white people who live in the United States.

While Obama was in office, he allowed the United Nations to start establishing a presence within American cities with a global police force, sneaking his plot to give America’s sovereignty away under the guise of a organization called the Strong Cities Network. This unconstitutional move was largely criticized by patriotic groups, as the Constitution requires a treaty before allowing any foreign military presence to base itself on American soil.

The Strong Cities Network (SCN) was launched by the United Nations back in September 2015, providing the first ever global network of mayors and municipal-level policy makers with the stated goal of providing a “community” to “counter violent extremism in all its forms.”

Along with the United Nations’ Responsibility to Protect doctrine, an enabling principle that allows in international community to intervene when they discover “crimes being committed against humanity, ” the UN can take it upon themselves to “safeguard” any citizen who they view is being racially discriminated against. To put it in more simple terms, the UN can invade a country with their UN police force if they determine that “crimes against humanity” have occurred.

Now in an unbelievable power move, United Nations’ Human Rights commissioners have ruled they’ve found “alarming racism” trends in our country, and are threatening to intervene unless white Americans meet their demands and start paying blacks “reparations” for slavery. The Washington Post reports:

The history of slavery in the United States justifies reparations for African Americans, argues a recent report by a U.N.-affiliated group based in Geneva.

This conclusion was part of a study by the United Nations’ Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent, a body that reports to the international organization’s High Commissioner on Human Rights. The group of experts, which includes leading human rights lawyers from around the world, presented its findings to the United Nations Human Rights Council on Monday, pointing to the continuing link between present injustices and the dark chapters of American history.

“In particular, the legacy of colonial history, enslavement, racial subordination and segregation, racial terrorism and racial inequality in the United States remains a serious challenge, as there has been no real commitment to reparations and to truth and reconciliation for people of African descent,” the report stated. “Contemporary police killings and the trauma that they create are reminiscent of the past racial terror of lynching.”

Citing the past year’s spate of police officers killing unarmed African American men, the panel warned against “impunity for state violence,” which has created, in its words, a “human rights crisis” that “must be addressed as a matter of urgency.”

CONTINUE WITH READING TO PAGE 2